Is Indefinite Detention Of Terror Suspects Justified

â€Å"Is Indefinite Detention of Terror Suspects Justified?† It is against human rights to detain and place possible terror suspects in detention centers without a trail. In America, everyone has a right to a fair trial even if a suspect could potentially pose a threat to our country. It is in violation to the Fifth Amendment and the essence of American due process and the rule of law. It is also going against what our Founding Fathers originally acclaimed our rights were. I find it unethical and is unconstitutional to have terror suspects detained without a trail. On January 7, 2011, President Barack Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 into law; the indefinite detention without trial of terrorist suspects, even for U.S. citizens seized on American soil. Justin Amash said, The frightening thing here is that the government is claiming the power under the Afghanistan authorization for use of military force as a justification for entering Amer ican homes to grab people, indefinitely detain them and not give them a charge or trial.† (House Passes Defense Bill). No one should be aloud to have the power to say a person should be indefinitely detained without charge or trial because they could cause danger to other people. Conservatives are worried that this bill will liberate power for the federal government, to have American citizens detained indefinitely if they are connected to terrorism even if they only contributed once to the group.Show MoreRelated3. Counter-Terrorism Strategies Reveal the Limits of Human Rights as a Cosmopolitan Discourse in the Age of Global Terror. Discuss.3315 Words   |  14 Pagesviolations, not only affect the terrorists whom they are aimed at, but start to affect the people who’s rights they aim to protect. Where the notion of human rights is concerned in protecting the individual, counter-terrorism in the age of global terror re-employs these boundaries between the individual in the interest of the state, and disregards human rights. Pojman (2006) states that terrorism is a type of violence employed to deliberately target non-combatants in a ruthlessly destructive andRead MoreRacial Profiling Based Upon Ethnicity and National Origin Essay6331 Words   |  26 PagesTo what extent can race, ethnicity, and national origin be used in targeting suspects for stops, searches, and arrests? This has become a growing concern of many since the tragic terrorist acts that took place on September 11th, 2001. Previously looked upon as unethical and almost universally condemned, the use of profiles based solely on race to identify possible terrorists is getting a second look. Both proponents and opponents are looking at the legitimacy and necessity of this practice. TheRead MoreIndividual Privacy vs National Security5833 Words   |  24 Pagesbut also for fear of being blamed for further terror attacks. So far, no president or presidential candidate will probably seek to curb the purview of the Committee on the public saf ety, nor hardly mention future changes. Privacy, like its colleague individualism, has been in decline anyway †Ã¢â‚¬Å" putting up only token resistance here and there against mass society, a corporate-based economy, and relentless bureaucratization. So perhaps the war on terror requires us to bid a fond adieu to privacyRead MoreThe Human Rights Act and Anti-Terrorism in the Uk: One Great Leap Forward by Parliament, but Are the Courts Able to Slow the Steady Retreat That Has Followed?17827 Words   |  72 Pagesfrom the principles enshrined in the HRA. The significance of procedural obstacles, as well as the inherent weaknesses of the HRA regime itself, will be considered. This paper will conclude by outlining some practical implications of recent UK anti-terror legislation. The Great leap forward The Purpose of the Human Rights Act In Rights Brought Home, the White Paper with which the Human Rights Bill was introduced in 1997, the Government clarified the purpose of the legislation: â€Å"It will give peopleRead MoreThe Human Rights Act and Anti-Terrorism in the Uk: One Great Leap Forward by Parliament, but Are the Courts Able to Slow the Steady Retreat That Has Followed?17817 Words   |  72 Pagesfrom the principles enshrined in the HRA. The significance of procedural obstacles, as well as the inherent weaknesses of the HRA regime itself, will be considered. This paper will conclude by outlining some practical implications of recent UK anti-terror legislation. The Great leap forward The Purpose of the Human Rights Act In Rights Brought Home, the White Paper with which the Human Rights Bill was introduced in 1997, the Government clarified the purpose of the legislation: â€Å"It will give people